Measuring a Portfolio’s Performance

In this example, the portfolio generated a Treynor Ratio of 6.67%, which indicates its performance relative to its exposure to systematic risk. A higher Treynor Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted return for the portfolio. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests that the portfolio’s returns are not adequate given the level of systematic risk it has assumed. Systematic risk, also known as market risk, is the risk inherent in the overall market or economic system. Excess return in this sense refers to the return earned above the return that could have been earned in a risk-free investment. Although there is no true risk-free investment, treasury bills are often used to represent the risk-free return in the Treynor ratio.

Access Exclusive Templates

Take self-paced courses to master the fundamentals of finance and connect with like-minded individuals. Our goal is to deliver the most understandable and comprehensive explanations of financial topics using simple writing complemented by helpful graphics and animation videos. Finance Strategists is a leading financial education organization that connects people with financial professionals, priding itself on providing accurate and reliable financial information to millions of readers each year. Over the years, several enhancements to the Treynor Ratio have been developed to address its limitations and improve its applicability to different investment scenarios.

Limitations of Each Ratio

The ratio’s accuracy mainly depends on using the right benchmarks for beta measurement. The beta should instead be based on a large cap-appropriate index, like the Russell 1000. Mathematically speaking, it determines how much excess return can be gained from the risk-free rate per unit of systematic risk.

What is the difference between the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor ratio?

The accuracy of the Treynor ratio is highly dependent on the use of appropriate benchmarks to measure beta. The Treynor ratio shares similarities with the Sharpe ratio, and both measure the risk and return of a portfolio. The premise behind this ratio is that investors must be compensated for the risk inherent to the portfolio, because diversification will not remove it. Again, we find that the best portfolio is not necessarily the portfolio with the highest return.

Measuring a Portfolio’s Performance

A portfolio with a consistently positive excess return will have a positive alpha, while a portfolio with a consistently negative excess return will have a negative alpha. Unlike the Treynor measure, the Sharpe ratio evaluates the portfolio manager on the basis of both the rate of return and diversification (it considers total portfolio risk as measured by the standard deviation in its denominator). Therefore, the Sharpe ratio is more appropriate for well-diversified portfolios because it more accurately takes into account the risks of the portfolio. When understanding the Treynor ratio, its similarity to the Sharpe ratio is worth noting.

Advisory services provided by Carbon Collective Investment LLC (“Carbon Collective”), an SEC-registered investment adviser. A copy of Carbon Collective’s current written disclosure statement discussing Carbon Collective’s business operations, services, and fees is available at the SEC’s investment adviser public information website – or our legal documents here. 11 Financial may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. 11 Financial’s website is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications, and links. Enhancements to the Treynor Ratio include the Modified Treynor Ratio, the Treynor-Black Model, and the incorporation of alternative risk measures like Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). The Treynor-Black Model is a portfolio optimization technique that combines the Treynor Ratio with the principles of modern portfolio theory.

If this is not the case, portfolios with identical systematic risk, but different total risk, will be rated the same. But the portfolio with a higher total risk is less diversified and therefore has a higher unsystematic risk which is not priced in the market. These tools provide the necessary information for investors to assess how effectively their money has been invested (or may be invested). Without evaluating risk-adjusted returns, an investor cannot possibly see What is herd behavior the whole investment picture, which may inadvertently lead to clouded decisions. Both the rate of return and risk for securities (or portfolios) will vary by time period.

By taking into account the risk inherent in the market, this metric offers investors a means of gauging the effectiveness of their investment decisions. The main disadvantage of the Treynor ratio is that it is backward-looking and that it relies on using a specific benchmark to measure beta. Most investments, though, don’t necessarily perform the same way in the future that they did in the past.

Consequently, the ratio may not be appropriate for comparing the performance of non-diversified portfolios or concentrated trading cryptocurrency: exchange basics investments, as these portfolios may have a significant level of unsystematic risk that is not captured by the ratio. An alternative method of ranking portfolio management is Jensen’s alpha, which quantifies the added return as the excess return above the security market line in the capital asset pricing model. As these two methods both determine rankings based on systematic risk alone, they will rank portfolios identically. Like the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio (T) does not quantify the value added, if any, of active portfolio management. A ranking of portfolios based on the Treynor Ratio is only useful if the portfolios under consideration are sub-portfolios of a broader, fully diversified portfolio.

Instead, other financial metrics should be used before making an investment decision. While no investment south african rand price action setups is truly risk-free, the Treynor ratio typically uses treasury bills to represent a risk-free return. Risk is determined by the portfolio’s beta, which is a measure of an investment portfolio’s general systematic risk. However, the ratio’s adequacy in representing performance is determined by comparing it to the Security Market Line (SML), which illustrates the relationship between risk and return for diversified portfolios.

1. The Treynor Ratio’s results can be sensitive to the input assumptions used in its calculation, such as the risk-free rate and portfolio beta.
2. Some researchers have proposed incorporating alternative risk measures into the Treynor Ratio, such as Value-at-Risk (VaR) or Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), to better capture the risk characteristics of certain investment portfolios.
3. When understanding the Treynor ratio, its similarity to the Sharpe ratio is worth noting.

Instead, the beta should be measured against an index more representative of the large-cap universe, such as the Russell 1000 index. Learn more about these measurements and how to use them to evaluate portfolios. Suppose you are comparing two portfolios, an Equity Portfolio and a Fixed Income Portfolio. You’ve done extensive research on both portfolios and can’t decide which one is a better investment.

The expected or actual rate of return can be measured in any time frame, as long as the measurement is consistent. Once the risk-free rate is subtracted from the expected or actual rate of return it would then be divided by the standard deviation. The Treynor Ratio is a portfolio performance measure that adjusts for systematic risk. In contrast to the Sharpe Ratio, which adjusts return with the standard deviation of the portfolio, the Treynor Ratio uses the Portfolio Beta, which is a measure of systematic risk. As well, like other financial metrics, the Treynor ratio has a few limitations, such as its historical nature.